Search

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Hereafter


Death consumes all life, whether living or dead. Loved ones are torn from us, causing us to question the realms of reality and wonder if there is a hereafter for life. Others have developed a connection to those gone, leaving the majority of humans to label these sorts of connections as “gifts”. Most would argue that knowing everything about someone the moment you meet them would be great, dissolving any awkwardness, and letting your true self to open expressively. Yet that is not always the case, as Clint Eastwood (Million Dollar Baby, Dirty Harry) shows through his next great movie gem, Hereafter.

In Hereafter, Eastwood links together three subplot into one main storyline, leaving an overwhelming amount of movie depth. All three subplots are about those haunted from mortality. The first story is about Marie Lelay (Cecile de France, High Tension), a very famous French journalist and news anchor. While vacationing in Thailand, a tsunami hits, causing mass chaos and panic. Lelay is overcome by the powerful waves, hits her head and drowns to death. She finds herself surrounded in an area of openness and shadows, all in an almost peaceful calm. But she is then ripped back to reality when some survivors use CPR to bring her back to life. When back in France, Lelay cannot overcome her experiences, which starts to reflect on her work. She finally becomes so consumed with the possibility of a hereafter that her successful, money-filled life derails itself into a fiery inferno.

The next story is about two twins brothers in England, Marcus and Jason (Frankie and George McLaren), both of whom live with their drug-abusing, alcoholic mother. After Jason dies in an accident, Marcus is left to fend against the world by himself. Soon after, another shattering blow shakes Marcus’ world as his mother is admitted into rehab, causing him to enter foster care. Yet Marcus cannot comprehend that his brother is gone and becomes obsessed with trying to find a psychic to contact his lost sibling.

Finally, the last story is about George Lonegan (Matt Damon, The Departed), a psychic who has repeatedly tried to renounce his ability to contact the dead. After having an illness as a child which required neurosurgery, Lonegan has developed the ability to connect to those that have left us by touching the hands of people. Yet Lonegan refers to his “powers” as not a gift, but a curse. While his older brother Billy (Jay Mohr, Jerry Maguire) pushes George into helping others connect to those gone, George cannot escape the fact that while he has this ability, he cannot live a normal life. This comes to a point when he grows feeling for his cooking class partner Melanie (Bryce Dallas Howard, The Village), which is then shattered when she persuades George to give her a reading, delving far into her traumatic childhood. George is then left to drown in his depression.

Eastwood, who is the mastermind behind other great movies such as Gran Torino (2008) and Million Dollar Baby (2004) and has in the past reflected natural human emotions superbly on film, has yet again left an awestruck audience. The way he portraits characters as the average person, fighting the daily struggle between sanity and insanity, has to be applauded. This film does, however, veer off from the action packed movies Eastwood has always excelled in, leaving in its wake the always present depressing undertone of his films. And with a cast full of European film stars, besides Matt Damon, he leads an admirable change from the overused -dare I say, nauseating- American film faces we are used too to the use of new faces that have never before been across an American film screen. Although, Eastwood was not able to creatively link all three subplots into one smooth, moving film. This often creates confusion for the audience, leaping from one to story to another without an sense of a smooth transition. This lack of collaboration leads to the rather disappointing and lame climax of the film, which ties all three stories together.

Matt Damon was, as always, magnificent. The way he portrayed a man whose life choose him and not the other way around leaves a sensible blow on the audience. Cecile de France had a grace only the French could have on screen. In her first American film since Disney’s Around the World in 80 Days (2004), de France has re-sparked a use of European film stars that other directors should consider. Yet the acting that blew the limits of my mental capacity was that of twins George and Frankie McLaren. Both twins, who took turns playing Marcus after the character Jason had died, were astounding. Considering that this was there first dip into acting, they have to be glorified. Great things should be expected to come from this duo, achievements that could rival the Phelps twins from Harry Potter. Nonetheless, one actor that failed to show as if he was taking the film seriously was Jay Mohr. Granted that Mohr is a comedian does not compensate for the fact that his facial expression’s were far off from the mood of the film. With off beat expressions and glazed over eyes, the audience receives a feeling that Mohr doesn’t even want to be in front of the camera at that moment.

Despite a sub-par linkage of the three stories, Hereafter was still very good. Slow at times, dragging out some commentary as one would drag out an argument, this is not a movie for action lovers. The films scale tips heavily to a more psychological genre. A fresh script and cast, a superb director, and an excellent run time of only 129 minutes, the American average, Hereafter has only added to the repertoire of Clint Eastwood. Plus, having a mental twist on things, many audience members are left wondering if death will affect them the same as the characters of the film. The question is not if, it’s when.

3 stars of out 4

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Salt




Move over Jason Bourne, your time has past. Meet the new face of bad-ass spies, Ms. Evelyn Salt.

Salt starts out with CIA agents Salt (Jolie) and Ted Winter (Liev Schreiber) about to punch out for the day when a Russian man walks off the street and says he has knowledge about Russian Spies. The man then goes into a story of how the Russians have developed a system to take children in, “Americanize” them, and create the ultimate spy. Then he drops a bomb-shell. He explains that the Russian President will be assassinated by a Russian spy tomorrow during the funeral of the U.S. Vice President. The name of that spy is Evelyn Salt. Salt then performs a miraculous escape, while trying to reach her husband, who she believes to be in danger now that she is suspected of being a Russian spy. Which leaves you wondering throughout most of the movie as Salt runs from the Secret Service and CIA, “Who is Evelyn Salt?”

Now, was Salt a good movie? Yes.

Was Angelina Jolie pretty amazing doing some of her “death-defying” stunts? Yes.

Did Salt do anything different from other action/spy movies? No, and that’s the Achilles heel of Salt. We’ve seen enough cliche’ car chases to last a lifetime. Climbing on outside walls was already perfected by Matt Damon in The Bourne Identity and Spiderman, so please no more of that. And Jolie already did the stunt of jumping on fast moving objects in her surprise hit Wanted. So, in a nutshell, for action fans, this is just Hollywood throwing up old stunts, and putting a pretty face on it. Plus, with an ending that is somewhat of a cliff-hanger, you have to wonder if there will be a second Salt. For our sake, lets hope not.

2 stars out of 4

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Fight Club


I go to my local video store. I enter the “Favorites” section, and come across a movie labeled “I am Jack’s Movie”. Striking a curious spark of interest in me, I grab the dusty movie and head home. When I pop the DVD in, what do I find? The fabled, the infamous, one-of-the-best-movies-no-ones-ever-seen. Fight Club.

Fight Club is centered around an unnamed narrator (Edward Norton). We quickly learn that the “Narrator” is a struggling insomniac that has no one there for him. He soon discovers support groups (testicular cancer, brain tumor’s, etc.) are the tickets to the train for his ecstatic high. When he discovers that another woman is doing the same thing, the “Narrator” confronts her and they agree to split up support groups. Yet the all changes when the “Narrator” meets Tyler Durden. Tyler shows the “Narrator” how to live life to the fullest, how society is crumbling and someone needs to take a stand. Tyler and the “Narrator” then open the door with an underground boxing gang called “Fight Club”. Soon Fight Clubs are popping up all over the nation, and it seems as if the “Narrator” has finally found his place in life. Yet Tyler has bigger dreams for his new army of the Average Joes. Dreams that would affect more than just the pitiful lives of his followers.

With Brad Pitt and Norton giving phenomenal performances, this movie was just great to watch. That being said, there is one thing that needs to be pointed out. The plot, which starts out so fantastically, ends with a question mark. Expect a somewhat of a twist.

3 stars out of 4

“The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club. The second rule is YOU DO NOT TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB.” These words will go down as one of Brad Pitt’s best lines.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Best and Worst of 2010 (So Far...)

Well, it really has not been the greatest year for movies. With flops such as The Last Airbender, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and Clash of the Titans, I almost couldn’t find a movie worse than these three. However, I think I have.

The Worst Movie of 2010 (so far) has to be: Killers. This was just a complete waste of 93 minutes of my life. It was just a tasteless, zero comedy, zero chemistry movie with a plot already used in tons of other movies. Self-Conscious girl meets hot guy. They fall in love. Turns out he kills people. She accepts that. The End. That’s basically how this movie went. And I am sick and tired of Katherine Heigl playing the part of the woman who can’t get a man. She obvious is very pretty and seeing her in this role puts a “Are you kidding?” thought in my head. 1/2 a star out of 4.

And now for the Best of 2010 (so far). There have been some really beautiful pearls in this years load of crap called movies. Some of these include Toy Story 3, Shutter Island, and Get Him to the Greek (which acts almost as a sequel to Forgetting Sarah Marshall). Yet there has to be a winner and this year, it’s a tie. Now, i realize that having a tie for Best Movie just seems idiotic, but I honestly can type that i couldn’t choose between either two. The Best Movies of 2010 (so far) has to be: Kick Ass and Inception.

Kick Ass truely surprised me. With such an original storyline, great cast of characters and starring one of the funniest people alive in Christopher Mintz-Plasse (McLOVIN’!) this is as good as a “Must Own”. 4 stars out of 4.

Unlike Kick Ass, Inception didn’t surprise me by how well it was. It BLEW MY MIND. With a plot filled with twists, humor, action, and an ending that leaves you guessing, Inception was just fantastic. And with breathtaking special effects, it didn’t need 3D to be a great IMAX movie. Yet the best actor wasn’t Leonardo DiCaprio. That title goes to Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who basically acted his way into Chris Nolan’s (Director) Third Batman movie, possibly playing The Riddler. When the time comes for Inception to come on DVD, I will definitely be in line for my copy. 4 stars out of 4

Quick Rundown and Oscar Pick

Cop Out: Has funny moments, but Tracy Morgan needs to calm down. 2 1/2 stars out of 4

Dear John: Story line becomes too incomprehensible near the end and Channing Tatum just cannot act. However, some moments do make you want to grab on to your special someone and to not let go. 2 stars out of 4

The Crazies: George A. Romero would have been proud of the amount of sick, twisted, irronic gore that this one displays. It’s borderline disgusting. 2 1/2 stars out of 4

She’s Out of My League: Funny trailer and cast, just not a great performance. Also, Adam Tomei and Alice Eve just do NOT have good camera chemistry. 1 1/2 stars out of 4

And now, the Oscars. It was almost disappointing this year. Granted, I DID want The Hurt Locker to get Picture of the Year, I just believe Avatar and James Cameron deserved more awards than what was given.

Daybreakers

(WARNING: THIS MOVIE ISN”T FOR THE FAINT OF HEART)

Those Spierig brothers are at it again (Undead, 2003)! And this time, these aren’t your average Twilight vampires. They won’t protect you from werewolves. These vampires will slash, bash, and gash just to get that last drop of human blood, or die trying.

The year is 2019. 10 years ago, a plague has transformed much of the world’s humans into blood-sucking vampires. Now, only 5% of the human population remains. Edward Dalton (Ethan Hawke, Training Day) is a vampire scientist (yes, I know, great original vampire name) trying to find a blood substitute for the dwindling human blood supply, because if the vampires do not get the required amount of blood, they would mutate into demonic winged creatures called subsiders and have an uncontrollable urge for human blood. He has no one to turn to with his prospects for finding a cure to save humanity. With his brother Frankie (Micheal Dorman, Walnut) is the army and a human hunter, and with the company he works for being a house for human cattle, it seems that all Edward can do is wait for the Vampire race to die out. While on his way home, Edward ends up in a fender bender with an SUV containing some of the last free humans. Soon after, the police arrive and Edward hides the humans in his car, proving to the humans that he is a trustworthy vampire that will help them with their cause. After making contact with a human woman who was in the SUV, Edward sets up a meeting with a human that has discovered a possible cure to the vampirism. And with the whole vampire population on the brink of world wide famine, could this human know the cure?

This movie was crazy! The directors gave the audience some good ol’ fashioned vampires that don’t play footsie with humans. And with bodies exploding, heads being ripped off, guts flying through the air, it’s nice for people who don’t really enjoy the gore genre to have a great actor as a companion through this demonic hell. Ethan Hawke was at the top of his game, and with costars such as Sam Niell (Jurassic Park I and III) and Isabel Lucas (Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen), the chemistry between these vampires were a thousand times better than the supposed vampire chemistry in the Twilight series.

However, the special effects weren’t as up to date with technology as some movies, such as Avatar and Transformers, are. Also, some of the scenes were just rushed through, while other seemingly unimportant scenes were dragged on far too long.

Overall, this movie isn’t a must see, yet a great movie for fans off blood spewing, gore splattering action. But if you’re looking for a sappy human-vampire love story, you’re looking in the wrong theater.

2 1/2 stars out of 4

Sherlock Holmes

sherlock_holmes_downey_jr_poster[1]

OK, lets just get this out of the way. THIS MOVIE WILL BLOW YOUR MIND! It totally redefines what makes a great detective. Every single person in a CSI wishes they held Holmes immense logic. He is able to figure out even the most witful criminal just by, literally, looking at them. If real, he would have gone down in history as the greatest detective ever.

A man by the name of Lord Blackwood has been going around London, executing evil rituals and spreading black magic. When Holmes foils Blackwoods ritual, in which a woman was going to kill herself, and sends Blackwood to jail, he informs Holmes that there are things in which Holmes cannot control and he must “Widen your gaze, Holmes” in order to solve Blackwoods intentions. With the help of his trustful sidekick, Watson, Holmes enters a world of magic, politics, and futuristic inventions. Will Holmes survive, or will he fall into a spider’s web of trickery?

All in all, this is probably in the top 50 best movies I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot of movies.

3 1/2 out of 4